Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:17:23 +0000 From: David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org> To: Erik Cederstrand <erik@cederstrand.dk> Cc: "toolchain@freebsd.org" <toolchain@FreeBSD.org>, Pete chou <pete.chou@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Using non-standard linker Message-ID: <4292EBED-F73B-43E7-A496-5345462B0021@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <F28985E4-AFDE-4FB8-9DBE-9458610598BE@cederstrand.dk> References: <089FCDB5-C0D2-4675-AB71-FD7089BFA031@cederstrand.dk> <5880F938-A9EC-4B2D-8079-42504DFA87F9@FreeBSD.org> <5337BAB6-7EEE-4A1E-9660-902544CCE3EE@cederstrand.dk> <8450A192-367E-4577-97C5-114EDD094BD4@bsdimp.com> <F28985E4-AFDE-4FB8-9DBE-9458610598BE@cederstrand.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14 Dec 2012, at 08:15, Erik Cederstrand wrote: > Would this be acceptable in FreeBSD if I created a patch, or are you just suggesting it for my local testing? I think that we will probably want to import MCLinker as soon as it is able to (correctly) link the base system, and at that point a patch is probably a good idea. I'll try to ensure that there is infrastructure in clang for selecting the linker by that time as well. David
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4292EBED-F73B-43E7-A496-5345462B0021>