Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:04:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@MIT.EDU> To: current@freebsd.org Cc: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.net>, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Experiences with FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 Message-ID: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1109261403400.882@multics.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmon%2BcE3SjR%2BT7W%2BGWSsdwxZc4OGEoTiA_-NR-Mp=CGWY1Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <201109260053.SAA25795@lariat.net> <CAJ-Vmon%2BcE3SjR%2BT7W%2BGWSsdwxZc4OGEoTiA_-NR-Mp=CGWY1Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Adrian Chadd wrote: > I agree, the lack of a virtual/emergency terminal seems a bit silly. > > I'm not sure about the cons25 versus xterm stuff - you're not the > first person to report this. Guys/girls/other (Hi SF!) - why is this? > :) > > It shouldn't be that hard to submit a patch to enable those extra vtys? While one's at it, having the primary installer dialogs be on not-vt0 (i.e. not the console) would eliminate the issue where LOR spew takes out parts of the dialog. -Ben Kaduk
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.GSO.1.10.1109261403400.882>