Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 14:26:51 -0700 From: Don Dugger <dugger@hotlz.com> To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Subject: Re: Why is not more FreeBSD software written in C++? Message-ID: <444A9F9B.3080006@hotlz.com> In-Reply-To: <86irp1nwjq.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <200604221603.k3MG3rmI003382@mist.nodomain> <444A64A3.2020208@hotlz.com> <86zmido6m7.fsf@xps.des.no> <444A7F6A.4050206@hotlz.com> <86irp1nwjq.fsf@xps.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: >Don Dugger <dugger@hotlz.com> writes: > > >>Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@des.no> writes: >> >> >>>// comments are neither better nor worse than /* */ comments, and >>>they have been available in C for seven years now. >>> >>> >>That's pure opinion and one that I haven't head. >> >> > >The availability of // comments in C99, which is now seven years old, >is fact, not opinion. > >DES > > Wrong part of the statement I was talking about it being better or worse. And again you your missing the point. What does this have to do with why one would use c rather then c++? Or the myth that c++ has poor performance in comparison to c. Don 8)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?444A9F9B.3080006>