Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 14:48:08 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Daniel Bond <db@danielbond.org> Cc: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Steve Polyack <korvus@comcast.net> Subject: Re: PAM completeness and standardization [PR:bin/71290] Message-ID: <867i0m5vxz.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <F24A533C-C88F-4BB1-B91B-EF303D095E29@danielbond.org> (Daniel Bond's message of "Tue, 12 May 2009 13:51:58 %2B0200") References: <34B37CEC-AF7A-48EE-81F5-7B19291F99EF@danielbond.org> <49E8D18C.4070603@comcast.net> <F24A533C-C88F-4BB1-B91B-EF303D095E29@danielbond.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel Bond <db@danielbond.org> writes: > I have a NetBSD 5.0 installation on my private server, I'll start > looking at how they have implemented PAM. Specifically, you should look at how they've adapted their passwd(1) and what pam_sm_chauthtok() looks like in their PAM modules. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?867i0m5vxz.fsf>