Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 11:55:03 +0400 (MSD) From: Igor Sysoev <is@rambler-co.ru> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendfile(2) SF_NOPUSH flag proposal Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0305291153300.52120-100000@is> In-Reply-To: <3ED5A105.26F528A6@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Terry Lambert wrote: > Igor Sysoev wrote: > > > will result in you sleeping with PRUS_MORETOCOME set, but with > > > no more being sent because the send buffer doesn't get emptied, > > > as it's waiting for more data to send. > > > > But as I understand PRUS_MORETOCOME is not set if socket is non-blocking. > > Then the bug is still not fixed by setting it, since your total > send size might be less than `sysctl net.inet.tcp.sendspace`. Why ? We can reset TF_MORETOCOME if the sending is completed. > You guys should really just have a buffer finalize function > that gets called on block/return cases, and impute the flags > you need on the socket while it's being used for sendfile. Igor Sysoev http://sysoev.ru/en/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0305291153300.52120-100000>