Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:23:59 +0100 From: Florent Thoumie <flz@FreeBSD.org> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/rdesktop pkg-plist Message-ID: <42309ECF.1090306@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20050310191906.GG48850@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <200503101905.j2AJ5B6R013928@repoman.freebsd.org> <42309B5B.7020201@FreeBSD.org> <20050310191906.GG48850@toxic.magnesium.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig4E53C3A9D82CCAD589BE5EA8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Adam Weinberger wrote: >>>(03.10.2005 @ 1409 PST): Florent Thoumie said, in 1.2K: << >> >>David E. O'Brien wrote: >> >>>obrien 2005-03-10 19:05:11 UTC >>> >>> FreeBSD ports repository >>> >>> Modified files: >>> net/rdesktop pkg-plist >>> Log: >>> Sort the keymaps. >>> >>> Revision Changes Path >>> 1.5 +32 -32 ports/net/rdesktop/pkg-plist >> >> This is your third commit to get rdesktop updated >> in two days. >> >> There was a PR pending with a patch included. Maintainer >> has been cc'ed. >> >> Please respect ownership when not working on your ports, >> or at least wait for maintainer timeout before applying >> your changes. >> >>>end of "Re: cvs commit: ports/net/rdesktop pkg-plist" from Florent Thoumie << > > > Sorting the pkg-plist is a trivial change, and was the maintainer's > responsibility in the first place. Asking for maintainer approval > for trivial fixes supports a level of bureaucracy that, while nice > in concept, simple prevents people from applying trivial fixes. I'm ok, not talking about just sorting the packing list. > Note that I'm not commenting on David's other commits to rdesktop; > I haven't looked at them. Note also that I do not know what is in > the PR. My only argument here is that committers should not feel > like applying trivial fixes and routine maintenance to the ports > tree amounts to stepping on someone's toes. He might be very familiar with this port, I really don't know, but I've even seen discussions about security updates where maintainer rejected submitted patches. That's their right. The only fact that a PR about rdesktop was in feedback state should prevent him from just committing an update. My 2 (new committer's and maintainer's) cents. --------------enig4E53C3A9D82CCAD589BE5EA8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCMJ7TMxEkbVFH3PQRAhswAJwNL4Q5Tq6rBspbJGNMq+Er6U2vywCffV5B eDt7gX420UNlIw9/F6QaGEk= =VFQ+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig4E53C3A9D82CCAD589BE5EA8--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42309ECF.1090306>