Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 12:58:28 +0200 From: freebsdonline <lists2@freebsdonline.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: random_harvestq eats much on geode-lx alix2c3 Message-ID: <528C95D4.4090806@freebsdonline.com> In-Reply-To: <1995425.XJjfe8p5PP@aurora> References: <4041856.BpQXZdSKfK@aurora> <C33F6708-0FA5-4AC3-90BD-807B27FE264C@FreeBSD.org> <1995425.XJjfe8p5PP@aurora>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Stanisław Halik wrote: > but what do you ask for? Also, can text > attachments be put here? For posterity's sake, better not to link to them. It is poor hardware as you said but FreeBSD should run well on it. I also have Alix boards running FreeBSD as router, and cpu load is almost 0. last pid: 2799; load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 up 0+11:29:10 11:29:53 14 processes: 1 running, 13 sleeping CPU: 1.1% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 98.9% idle Mem: 8376K Active, 6752K Inact, 23M Wired, 620K Cache, 21M Buf, 195M Free Swap: uname -a FreeBSD firewall 8.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #1: Sun Mar 20 01:51:47 EET 2011 root@firewall:/usr/obj/nanobsd.custom/usr/src/sys/FIREWALL i386 I did not deployed yet 10.x (I'm waiting for nanobsd.sh to correct problems with pkgng) for now I am running it on VirtualBox, but I hope it will also run well on Alix hardware. Your problems were on 10.x or 11.x?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?528C95D4.4090806>