Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 08:54:51 -0500 (CDT) From: J Bacher <jb@jbacher.com> To: Jim Weeks <jim@siteplus.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: DNS: having domain1.com and domain1.net point to the same IP. Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0009290852460.8156-100000@ns.shawneelink.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009290820270.272-100000@veager.siteplus.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Andy Wolf wrote: > > > We use two A records now and therefor accept redundancy. The reverse lookup > > of course can only point to one of the labels. > > The general consensus throughout the industry seems to be that C names are > evil. > > I have never been bitten by just using A names. The efficiency of the CNAME record is that is eliminates oversight when re-IPing a network, subnetwork or group of servers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.4.21.0009290852460.8156-100000>