Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 29 Sep 2000 08:54:51 -0500 (CDT)
From:      J Bacher <jb@jbacher.com>
To:        Jim Weeks <jim@siteplus.net>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   RE: DNS: having domain1.com and domain1.net point to the same IP.
Message-ID:  <Pine.OSF.4.21.0009290852460.8156-100000@ns.shawneelink.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009290820270.272-100000@veager.siteplus.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Andy Wolf wrote:
>  
> > We use two A records now and therefor accept redundancy. The reverse lookup
> > of course can only point to one of the labels.
> 
> The general consensus throughout the industry seems to be that C names are
> evil.
> 
> I have never been bitten by just using A names.


The efficiency of the CNAME record is that is eliminates oversight when
re-IPing a network, subnetwork or group of servers.




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.4.21.0009290852460.8156-100000>