Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 08:07:03 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [PATCH]: additional futex operations Message-ID: <20080320080703.ws5h2vaqskkw4w0s@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20080319204521.GA98846@freebsd.org> References: <96317980@ipt.ru> <20080319204521.GA98846@freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Quoting Roman Divacky <rdivacky@FreeBSD.org> (from Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:45:21 +0100): > > can you guys please test: > > www.vlakno.cz/~rdivacky/futex_private_pi.patch > > especially if linux-firefox is still broken with this patch. What do you think about rate limiting (only one) the FD case instead of hiding it completely (and using the content of the comment as the message to print with a little bit of "only report if something is obviously broken")? This way we could determine if we need it for linux-backwards compatibility. Is this a proof of concept (do you plan to make a no-op LINUX_FUTEX_PRIVATE_FLAG case in the switch to be consistent) or the final solution? I see pros/cons for both and I think it doesn't matter how it is done, I'm just curious about your opinion. Extremely nit-pickicking mode (you can silently ignore it): s/But it/It/ s/any sense/sense/ Bye, Alexander. -- Hubbard's Law: Don't take life too seriously; you won't get out of it alive. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080320080703.ws5h2vaqskkw4w0s>