Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 13:55:27 +0000 From: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> To: Xin LI <delphij@frontfree.net> Cc: tjr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Benchmark: NetBSD 2.0 beats FreeBSD 5.3 Message-ID: <20050108135526.GQ49329@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <20050107101006.GA2553@frontfree.net> References: <41DE4F3D.8050509@syskonnect.de> <20050107091004.83732.qmail@web52710.mail.yahoo.com> <20050107092110.GG49329@submonkey.net> <20050107101006.GA2553@frontfree.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 06:10:06PM +0800, Xin LI wrote: > On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 09:21:10AM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote: > > I don't really think that this benchmark is bad news for either OS. My > > only real concern are the process creation/termination results on FreeBSD. > > I guess that this might worth investigating: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~das/pbench/pbench.html > > (Unfortuantelly, neither tjr@ nor I have touched our patchsets recently. > A most recent snapshot of the two patchsets are here: > > http://research.delphij.net/freebsd/pid.diff > http://research.delphij.net/freebsd/pid-tjr.diff) > > Most of the work was to catch up with Aug 2004's -CURRENT, but it might > be easier to bring them up-to-date instead of working from the very original > patches =-) Looks great. Any reason why neither has been committed? Ceri -- Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. -- Einstein (attrib.) [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3+ZOocfcwTS3JF8RAmRSAJ0ZmOwRax/EvRl4dxLbIEzw89O6QACfUGWe 8TZzjp2zViQjjnF9V679B1Y= =oZHS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050108135526.GQ49329>