Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 18:49:54 +0200 From: Alessandro de Manzano <adm@unixmania.net> To: Otterr <otterr@telocity.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: status of ATA subsystem Message-ID: <20020402184954.A32255@libero.sunshine.ale> In-Reply-To: <001b01c1d9cf$658817c0$2800a8c0@dixiechicken.net>; from otterr@telocity.com on Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 05:48:51PM -0500 References: <20020401223127.A28182@libero.sunshine.ale> <001b01c1d9cf$658817c0$2800a8c0@dixiechicken.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 05:48:51PM -0500, Otterr wrote: > If stability is an issue, maybe you should look into RELENG_4_5 for only > fixes since -RELEASE. > -Otter Yes, true, but I'm used to deploy -STABLE machines as my servers. I upgrade them just one or two times max. between different -RELEASEs. On some very critical machines I'm using RELENG_4_5, but on others no. Also because often they have new / fixed interesting and useful features. IMHO ATA subsystem is so important that should always be as stable as possibile in "-stable" (I'm not criticizing anyone!). I hope these problems will be eventually fixed, before the not so far away 4.6-release... -- bye! Ale To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020402184954.A32255>