Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 01:16:42 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: Alan Cox <alc@cs.rice.edu> Cc: Max Khon <fjoe@samodelkin.net> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys mbuf.h src/sys/kern uipc_mbuf.c uipc_syscalls.c src/usr.bin/netstat mbuf.c src/lib/libc/sys sendfile.2 Message-ID: <20040618011324.J72823@odysseus.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <20040617232217.GC18591@cs.rice.edu> References: <200406170008.i5H08NDt085108@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040617182031.GA8170@samodelkin.net> <20040617204813.GA10670@samodelkin.net> <20040617214827.GB6029@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> <7071.208.178.23.220.1087509793.squirrel@208.178.23.220> <20040617232217.GC18591@cs.rice.edu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Alan Cox wrote: > This is true of RELENG_4. In HEAD sf_bufs are very different. They > are used to implement pipes, swap-backed mds, exec_map_first_page(), I understand that, but I don't see it as a reason to remove sfbuf statistics from netstat -m. sfbufs certainly have an important role for anyone running Apache 2 (which uses sendfile by default), and if someone is having network memory shortages, it makes sense to show them the relevant info when they go looking. Mike "Silby" Silbersackhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040618011324.J72823>