Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 07:24:38 +0200 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What are people using for MUA's nowadays? Message-ID: <xzpeky0goa1.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.1.20030929053024.02ce0008@popserver.sfu.ca> (Colin Percival's message of "Mon, 29 Sep 2003 05:34:56 %2B0100") References: <xzpisndgqk1.fsf@dwp.des.no> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0309271138260.459@a.shell.peak.org> <2493.67.85.96.168.1064692382.squirrel@www.wingfoot.org> <a06001a05bb9ba8d12cb8@[10.0.1.4]> <xzpisndgqk1.fsf@dwp.des.no> <5.0.2.1.1.20030929053024.02ce0008@popserver.sfu.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> writes: > International standards, such as the RFCs? Every text-protocol RFC > I've seen has been pretty clear about requiring CRLF pairs. RFCs are not Unix-specific. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpeky0goa1.fsf>