Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 16:04:34 +0100 From: Maciej Milewski <milu@dat.pl> To: Frank Leonhardt <frank2@fjl.co.uk>, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: dhcpd static binding problem Message-ID: <529DF302.5040200@dat.pl> In-Reply-To: <529DEB6B.5000000@fjl.co.uk> References: <529DD95A.50103@fjl.co.uk> <529DE822.7060204@dat.pl> <529DEB6B.5000000@fjl.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03.12.2013 15:32, Frank Leonhardt wrote: > I wasn't! It was a typo and it was cut/pasted so subsequent entries, > so thanks for spotting it as it's been driving me crazy. > > Next questions (assuming it now works): > > How come WINDOWXP-PC did get the address 192.168.1.194? Very weird. Maybe that's windows fallback address, if you had earlier range up to 199 and windows got 194? Maybe after reconfiguration dhcpd wasn't restared? I have no more ideas. > > How come dhcpd didn't complain; even when I ran it with the -t option > to check the config file, and the -d option to explain exactly what it > was doing. Of course I didn't want to assign 192.16*9*.1.229, but I > can't see why it didn't just do what I asked OR complain it was > illegal? Just silently ignoring it wasn't very helpful. > > Regards, Frank. I admit that's silence isn't helpful but have no idea if there is other option. That's one of the services set-and-forget :) -- Pozdrawiam, Maciej Milewski
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?529DF302.5040200>