Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 15:29:54 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: terry@safetynet.net (Terry Lambert) Cc: wscott@pdxlx008.intel.com, bde@zeta.org.au, terry@lambert.org, current@freefall.freebsd.org, dyson@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: Optimization topics Message-ID: <199601302229.PAA07678@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199601302034.NAA07203@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Jan 30, 96 01:34:00 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I want a MIPS port. All unaligned access is to be forbidden, not just > where it may impact performance. > > Unaligned access is one of the things tying Win95 to Intel. Note: that may have seemed harsh. I am a portability bigot, not an anti-Intel bigot. ...Though if you could get rid of segements in the P7 design, I'd be grateful. 8-). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601302229.PAA07678>