Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 8 Aug 1995 11:01:31 -0700 (PDT)
From:      "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>
To:        gibbs@freefall.cdrom.com (Justin T. Gibbs)
Cc:        gary@palmer.demon.co.uk, jkh@time.cdrom.com, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de
Subject:   Re: workaround for talk's address problem
Message-ID:  <199508081801.LAA04395@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>
In-Reply-To: <199508081534.IAA02766@freefall.cdrom.com> from "Justin T. Gibbs" at Aug 8, 95 08:34:07 am

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> 
> >In message <199508080043.RAA02014@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>, "Rodney W. Grimes" writ
> >e
> >s:
> >>Yes, but leads to a simple fix, running a cacheing name server on all
> >>NFS servers, and point your clients to that name server.
> >
> >Can you run named on a multi-homed Novell server? :-)
> >
> >Gary
> 
> Actually yes.  I believe that novell's NFS gateway comes with named, and
> NIS.

Unless they added this after netware 4.0 your wrong.  Novell's NFS comes
with lpr/lpd gateway code, but uses static sys:\etc\hosts file for
name resolution.  If it had DNS support I would have lost 5 system
sales last year :-).

Or is ``NFS Gateway'' something added after NFS 1.2b as a new product?


-- 
Rod Grimes                                      rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com
Accurate Automation Company                 Reliable computers for FreeBSD



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199508081801.LAA04395>