Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 16:36:34 -0600 From: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net> To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, igor@alecto.physics.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: Sendmail 8.8.4 questions... Message-ID: <l03010900aecbaaf1bdaa@[204.69.236.50]> In-Reply-To: <199612042058.NAA11575@rocky.mt.sri.com> References: <199612041958.NAA21344@alecto.physics.uiuc.edu> <199612041951.MAA11333@rocky.mt.sri.com> <199612041958.NAA21344@alecto.physics.uiuc.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>That would be 2.1.6.1. And, it's a good release except for bugs that >weren't known about until *after* it was set in stone such as the >sendmail bug. And a very few changes have been committed since then. The ctm-src-2_1 list still gets changes once or twice a week. I will be happy to continue to distribute any additional changes that get committed. (Like a new sendmail ?) IMHO, such security problem patches SHOULD get committed to the 2.1 tree UNTIL 2.2 has proven itself. Since 2.2 is just now in "beta", I would guess that might be around March, 1997. If the existing commiters REFUSE to do so, perhaps we need some other/additional committers who ARE WILLING. (I know it ain't fun, but it really does go a long way toward giving us a reputation for the highest quality)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?l03010900aecbaaf1bdaa>