Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:38:25 +0000 From: Prafulla Deuskar <pdeuskar@FreeBSD.org> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h Message-ID: <20060804143825.GA8797@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20060804095414.GU96644@FreeBSD.org> References: <200608031905.k73J55D2061870@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060804095414.GU96644@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gleb Smirnoff [glebius@FreeBSD.org] wrote: > Prafulla, > > On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 07:05:05PM +0000, Prafulla Deuskar wrote: > P> pdeuskar 2006-08-03 19:05:05 UTC > P> > P> FreeBSD src repository > P> > P> Modified files: > P> sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h > P> Log: > P> Revert back changes to made in rev 1.109 of if_em.c which were unnecessary. > P> This makes it easier for us to get the changes into -current and to -stable quickly. > > Can you please confirm that this was a mechanical substitution like this: > > s/sc/adapter/g > s/em_softc/adapter/g > > and no more additional changes? If this is true, then I hope that we > (FreeBSD and Intel) have finally came to a common codebase. This is good. :) > I can stand the long unusual name for driver softc with no problems. > > I'm only a bit disappointed by the fact, that I haven't received a single > email about these plans. You were in the void for a long time, and > then began your work with a commit, w/o informing people who were > maintaining driver while the vendor maintanance was on a hiatus. > Yes - it was a mechanical substitution. And thanks for taking care of 6.0.5 release. Thanks, Prafulla
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060804143825.GA8797>