Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 00:34:09 -0500 From: Chris Costello <chris@holly.dyndns.org> To: ben@rosengart.com Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kernel size over the last week Message-ID: <19990413003409.A1968@holly.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9904121431570.9444-100000@echonyc.com>; from Snob Art Genre on Mon, Apr 12, 1999 at 02:38:49PM -0400 References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9904121431570.9444-100000@echonyc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 12, 1999, Snob Art Genre wrote: > I just built a kernel, from sources cvsupped last night. It's over 2 > megs in size, compared to 1.3 megs for a kernel built from the same > config file four days ago. Is this due to the change in the debugging > symbol policy? file(1) reports both kernels as 'ELF 32-bit LSB > executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (FreeBSD), dynamically linked, not > stripped'. Were there any drastic configuration differences? It seems to me that egcs binaries are a bit larger as far as file size goes, but my size change went from about 1.1-1.3 MB to about 1.7 MB. > Ben > > "You have your mind on computers, it seems." -- Chris Costello <chris@calldei.com> It's redundant! It's redundant! -R. E. Dundant To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990413003409.A1968>