Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:03:43 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> To: jyl_2006 <yilinjing2006@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sctp cmt =?utf-8?q?problem=EF=BC=9Ausing_two_wireless_cards_t?= =?utf-8?q?he_speed_is_lower_than_using_one_wireless_cards?= Message-ID: <4E70DE6F.100@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <1316005014487-4802660.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1316005014487-4802660.post@n5.nabble.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9/14/11 5:56 AM, jyl_2006 wrote: > Before testing cmt in wlan,we also turn on sysctl states by setting > sysctl net.inet.sctp.cmt_pf=1 > sysctl net.inet.sctp.cmt_use_dac=1 > sysctl net.inet.sctp.cmt_on_off=1 > > My Os is Freebsd8.2, I write a simple tarball to send data , and get data > from wireshark . > The result shows that both two path have data , but the time of two path is > much higher than one path. > > Can anyone point out something we did wrong or steps we missed? > Thanks in advance. are they on the same band? if so then they may be interfering with each other, leading a great reduction in throughput on BOTH cards. (radio interference, not software) > > > -- > View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/sctp-cmt-problem-using-two-wireless-cards-the-speed-is-lower-than-using-one-wireless-cards-tp4802660p4802660.html > Sent from the freebsd-net mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E70DE6F.100>