Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 14:00:45 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> To: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: updating rdist Message-ID: <20001112140045.K555@puck.firepipe.net> In-Reply-To: <20001111035905.A82574@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@FreeBSD.ORG on Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 03:59:05AM -0800 References: <20001111035905.A82574@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 03:59:05AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > I have just committed a `44bsd-rdist' port. > So the question is, do we totally remove `rdist' from the base system, > or update it to rdist 6.1.5? I personally think it's better to remove it and update in ports. Cy Schubert makes a good point (if it is valid; I didn't check and don't know myself) that 44bsd-rdist and rdist6 are interoperable on mutally exclusive systems. Hence, it makes sense that a system administrator should need to look in ports for what they need. -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001112140045.K555>