Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 11:10:51 -0800 From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Thomas Moestl <tmm@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG>, doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Please review: small patches for building documentation on FreeBSD/sparc64 Message-ID: <200211071910.gA7JApIF046141@intruder.bmah.org> In-Reply-To: <20021106212724.GB334@crow.dom2ip.de> References: <20021106150326.GA334@crow.dom2ip.de> <200211061842.gA6IgfcA037657@intruder.bmah.org> <20021106212724.GB334@crow.dom2ip.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
If memory serves me right, Thomas Moestl wrote:
> Hmmm, I think that openjade is best then. It's output in multibyte
> systems like Big5 or EUC-JP seems to not be mangled (as far as I can
> tell from visual inspection :), so I assume that the problems have
> been fixed now.
It'd be a lot cleaner if we can get all of our architectures using one
SGML parser. This most definitely *not* a requirement for 5.0, however.
:-)
> > > and the bletcherous perl wrapper
> > > which breaks port dependencies (fatal in a release build setting).
> >
> > I presume you meant for the openjade port. If you use USE_PERL5 instead
> > of setting BUILD_DEPENDS, I think the ports infrastructure should do the
> > right thing.
>
> Unfortunately it does not. USE_PERL5 just consists of:
>
> BUILD_DEPENDS+= perl${PERL_VERSION}:${PORTSDIR}/lang/perl5
> RUN_DEPENDS+= perl${PERL_VERSION}:${PORTSDIR}/lang/perl5
>
> PERL_VERSION is 5.6.1 in current, and the perl wrapper does install a
> perl5.6.1 link.
Oops...I misread the Makefile. You're right.
Bruce.
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5+ 20020506
iD8DBQE9yrq72MoxcVugUsMRAgBhAKCWZ/Xc3A815zxs56wxBMetGFwX1ACg1VTn
f+c3pg/XrAERChLwDUKXhTE=
=V7Ph
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200211071910.gA7JApIF046141>