Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 07:05:01 -0700 From: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> To: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD ARM List <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: FYI: ampere3 143arm64 (latest) vs. 150releng-arm64 (quarterly) qt6-webengine-6.9.3 build times: 38:37:16 vs. 52:51:59 Message-ID: <0D9F71B0-C93B-4C55-A3F9-6E56127AE607@yahoo.com>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
See: https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/ampere3/data/143arm64-default/eecd8319a031/logs/qt6-webengine-6.9.3.log (latest) vs. https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/ampere3/data/150releng-arm64-quarterly/68d7717d76bf/logs/qt6-webengine-6.9.3.log (quarterly) Of course, comparing such without having load average like information over the duration of the builds is problematical. I'll note that ampere2 also has an example 150releng-arm64 qt6-webengine-6.9.3 build time of: 51:30:57 . See: https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/ampere2/data/150releng-arm64-default/eecd8319a031/logs/qt6-webengine-6.9.3.log (latest) and ampere1 143arm64 qt6-webengine-6.9.3 a build time of: 38:57:34 . See: https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/ampere1/data/143arm64-quarterly/4533979ecdde/logs/qt6-webengine-6.9.3.log (quarterly) So the big difference is not just a one-time oddity on one ampere* . === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.comhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0D9F71B0-C93B-4C55-A3F9-6E56127AE607>