Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 08:57:18 -0600 From: Matthew Reimer <mreimer@vpop.net> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KAME IPsec on low-end hardware Message-ID: <3BEA9D4E.83E069EB@vpop.net> References: <lists.freebsd.security.20011108140840L.sakane@kame.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Does compression work with tunnels? If so, could you give an example SPD that demonstrates this? Thanks for all your ipsec work! Matt Shoichi Sakane wrote: > > > I suspect that compression would also affect response times, but > > omitting: > > > > compression_algorithm deflate; > > > > from racoon.conf results in a parse error. Does anyone know if > > compression can be disabled? > > "compression_algorithm deflate;" is just a information. > the compression algorithm would not be used when it was > in the configuration file. when you define ipcomp to the SPD, then > the compression will be used. > > > Also, is there much difference between racoon and isakmpd? AFAICT > > isakmpd supports dymamic client IP addresses, but that seems to be the > > only major difference. > > racoon can do too. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3BEA9D4E.83E069EB>