Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 06:21:58 -0700 From: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Cc: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Illumos/OpenSolaris SMF to FreeBSD Message-ID: <201606131321.u5DDLwHx091839@slippy.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: Message from Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> of "Mon, 13 Jun 2016 12:14:29 %2B0200." <575E8785.4000203@quip.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <575E8785.4000203@quip.cz>, Miroslav Lachman writes: > Cy Schubert wrote on 06/10/2016 19:23: > > Hi, > > > > What are people's thoughts about porting Illumos Service Management > > Facility (SMF) to FreeBSD? The Solaris SMF didn't replace their init(8), > > it's started by their init(8) through inittab -- we could use ttys or > > replace init. > > > > Like DTrace and ZFS, SMF is CDDL. Does that matter? > > > There are some work on port of Launchd / ReLaunchd (jobd) / Open Launchd > / nosh etc. > > https://wiki.freebsd.org/launchd > https://github.com/mheily/jobd > https://github.com/freebsd/openlaunchd I attended MNark's talk, via youtube live stream, at BSDCan. He pointed out the issues and that the search continues. > > https://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2015-07-2015-09.html#The-nosh-Proj > ect > > I personally prefer nosh but "anything" should be better than current state. I come from a mainframe (MVS, z/OS) background working with NetView and JES/2 & JES/3, including 10,000 lines of assembler source code mods to JES/2. I personally would like to see a mainframe class solution however it does not fit the UNIX philosophy. I'm sure we could borrow ideas. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> FreeBSD UNIX: <cy@FreeBSD.org> Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201606131321.u5DDLwHx091839>