Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 11 May 2007 11:29:46 -0400
From:      Scott Robbins <scottro@nyc.rr.com>
To:        freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: vmware3 networking confusion...
Message-ID:  <20070511152946.GH60355@uws1.starlofashions.com>
In-Reply-To: <30565.54146.qm@web63011.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
References:  <30565.54146.qm@web63011.mail.re1.yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 07:55:55AM -0700, Gore Jarold wrote:
> Following these instructions:
> 
> http://forums.bsdnexus.com/viewtopic.php?id=1534

Yeah, but those were written by a moron, me.  :)

> 
> I have this in my /usr/X11R6/etc/vmware/config file:
> 
> vmnet1.Bridged = "YES"
> vmnet1.BridgeInterface = "bge0"
> vmnet1.HostOnlyAddress = "192.168.0.90"
> vmnet1.HostOnlyNetMask = "255.255.255.0"
> 



> The bottom line is, if I configure my winXP guest to
> have IP 192.168.0.90, it complains that that address
> is already in use, and I can see it in the winXP arp
> table.  BUT, I cannot ping it.
> 
> If I give it 192.168.0.91, it isn't on the network. 
> It can still see .90 (is in the arp table) but it
> can't ping it.

Try letting it obtain an IP address automatically and see if that works.
At present, I don't have a running vmware installation on FreeBSD, so can't
doublecheck.  
> 
> 
> 
> [1] at least, I am fairly certain I installed the port
> with bridged networking ... is there any way I can
> verify this ?

Yes, your config, showing BridgeInterface shows that this is what you
did. 

-- 

Scott

GPG KeyID EB3467D6
( 1B848 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2  A409 FA54 D575 EB34 67D6)
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6

Xander: I can not stress enough how much I don't have plans. 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070511152946.GH60355>