Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 08:41:42 +0100 From: Lars Engels <lars.engels@0x20.net> To: Martin Sugioarto <martin@sugioarto.com> Cc: David DEMELIER <demelier.david@gmail.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why panic(9) ? Message-ID: <20110112074142.GI22635@e.0x20.net> In-Reply-To: <20110112081000.5330ae53@zelda.sugioarto.com> References: <AANLkTi=OQbS-0jJx0YwZhM7xDWPLOkaYYZAYfESUEvvM@mail.gmail.com> <CB13B0A9-E5EF-4351-9F17-C4628AA38004@mac.com> <AANLkTikP%2BxuPpVOxhU2msHHraRQRSUCqjG59S_Ss6pQ=@mail.gmail.com> <20110112081000.5330ae53@zelda.sugioarto.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--JifNnQum/cg2Woy5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 08:10:00AM +0100, Martin Sugioarto wrote: > Am Tue, 11 Jan 2011 22:11:13 +0100 > schrieb David DEMELIER <demelier.david@gmail.com>: [snip] Could we please stop bashing Windows 2000? We're also not talking about FreeBSD 3.x but FreeBSD-CURRENT, as this mailing list is used. In my experience you have to expect panics when you run CURRENT. If you don't like it, run a RELEASE which _should_ only panic when your hardware is faulty or you hit some obscure bug. --JifNnQum/cg2Woy5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk0tWzYACgkQKc512sD3afiKUwCgkkq3/pt/6RHK8YKy0IITsXKQ TDkAn3/kNeFDD2PqK37xsc2U9cjTkzjP =x/E7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JifNnQum/cg2Woy5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110112074142.GI22635>