Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 8 Jul 2007 12:30:11 -0700
From:      "Kevin Gerry" <sfpoof@gmail.com>
To:        "Michael C Voorhis" <mvoorhis@cs.wpi.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Subject:   Re: Issues with 'xl0' keeping link (bge0, em0 as well?)
Message-ID:  <c027a39a0707081230v51099908hae3961af656ace7a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <18049.19912.746062.704028@cs.wpi.edu>
References:  <c027a39a0706251819y157a352fu292dc2533c6920b1@mail.gmail.com> <20070626022444.GA6571@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <18049.19912.746062.704028@cs.wpi.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Did you ever have a result to this issue? What's interesting is my em0 NIC
doesn't seem to have the up/down issue that the xl NICs have.

On 6/26/07, Michael C Voorhis <mvoorhis@cs.wpi.edu> wrote:
>
> Steve Kargl writes:
> > Good luck in getting any help.  bge0 has been going DOWN/UP for
> > about 2 months.
>
> I've been having issues with em0 going up/down as well.  Have read
> FreeBSD-Stable, FreeBSD-Current, FreeBSD-net.  Having this problem
> with separate NICs on both 6.2-STABLE and 7.0-CURRENT.  On one SMP and
> one Uniprocessor machine, with and without POLLING, on shared (the UP)
> and unshared (on the SMP) interrupts.
>
> Since I found no recent complaints on the above mailing lists, I
> concluded I was being stupid and doing some obvious thing wrong.  I
> had thought to solve the trouble on one machine (the other is a
> notebook) by swapping in a Broadcom card, but reading your email here,
> it appears that that may not be a solution, either.
>
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c027a39a0707081230v51099908hae3961af656ace7a>