Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:31:01 +0100
From:      Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Sergey Skvortsov <skv@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/net/ssldump/files patch-ssl%ssldecode.c
Message-ID:  <1137756662.37162.14.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
In-Reply-To: <43D0C93D.1050704@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <200601201014.k0KAEMQ5053386@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060120102934.GB1026@k7.mavetju> <43D0BE68.6010403@FreeBSD.org> <20060120105326.GC1026@k7.mavetju>  <43D0C93D.1050704@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--=-rEBYweR3EGMf6qFTa9k0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Sergey Skvortsov p=ED=B9e v p=E1 20. 01. 2006 v 14:27 +0300:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>=20
> Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> >>
> >> Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> >>>>   FreeBSD ports repository
> >>>>
> >>>>   Added files:
> >>>>     net/ssldump/files    patch-ssl%ssldecode.c=20
> >>> Did I miss a naming-convention change?
> >
> >> History repeats itself... Ok.
> >>
> >> 1. I dislike "_" as path delimiter. It's not so obvious and aesthetic =
as
> >> "::" or "%".
> >=20
> > I don't like it neither, but I accepted the fact that there was a
> > proper naming standard for it so at least this wildgrowth of patch
> > files would be resolved.
>=20
> First of all, it is not a "proper naming standard". I always suggest to
> use SHOULD/MUST/etc words (RFC 2119) in "Porters' Handboook" to avoid
> any incomprehension. In current situation I prefer to treat "Please only
> use characters [-+._a-zA-Z0-9]" as "You SHOULD use characters
> [-+._a-zA-Z0-9]".
>=20
> Many committers do not like this "convention". Hence the above regex
> should be reviewed and extended. There is no technical problems with
> additional ":%" symbols. Patch names must be convenient, not procrustean.

Actually the policy was installed because % in file names gave problems
when importing CVS into Perforce.

--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
              <pav@FreeBSD.org>

I can't do that, that would make sense.

--=-rEBYweR3EGMf6qFTa9k0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBD0Mn1ntdYP8FOsoIRApkPAJ9gD5DxTGmWdOaDiYYT5ii2yZKJ/gCfQhWv
LfKCTDUFfNOrxWkWV3rYF3k=
=tcy5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-rEBYweR3EGMf6qFTa9k0--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1137756662.37162.14.camel>