Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:20:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPV6/KAME/protosw integration cleanup Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0108151020210.12730-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Firstly I would like to appologise to the KAME folks. I think that in general they are doing a wonderful job, and I was in a bad spot at the time and let my better judgement get over-run by my annoyance at what I saw (still do) as a rather poor implementation decision. Some of the KAME folks have gotten back to me in private and I believe that my issues have been at least considered and some of them will be addressed. I'm cycling through the compile/edit/compile sequence about 50 times a day here in the KSE stuff and all the false-hits I was getting due to KAME error messages was just getting overly annoying. Then I had to actually go through the KAME code liiking for process references and came across the VARARGS stuff... it was too much.. anyhow I'm satisfied that they are doing as good of a job as they can and that they will be considering whether any changes can be made to assit compiler checking of their stacks. I will not be doing any changes that affect them, Though I may still add the prototype definitions in protsw.h as that's a generally useful thing to do. On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > Robert Watson wrote: > > > [rebuke] julian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0108151020210.12730-100000>