Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 1 Dec 2003 16:55:54 -0500 (EST)
From:      Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   RE: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha mp_machdep.c
Message-ID:  <20031201165303.C4201-100000@mail.chesapeake.net>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20031201125930.jhb@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote:

>
> On 30-Nov-2003 Jeff Roberson wrote:
> > jeff        2003/11/30 14:08:24 PST
> >
> >   FreeBSD src repository
> >
> >   Modified files:
> >     sys/alpha/alpha      mp_machdep.c
> >   Log:
> >    - Set mp_maxid in a way that is consistent with every other arch.  It is
> >      one more than the last valid 'cpuid'.
> >
> >   Approved by:    re (rwatson)
>
> Eh?  No it's not.  All that needs to be true is that for every processor,
> PCPU_GET(cpuid) <= mp_maxid.
>
> It can be equal to the highest ID and should be so for most cases.

>From x86's mp_machdep:
        mp_maxid = MAXCPU;
ia64
mp_maxid = min(mp_ncpus, MAXCPU) - 1;

sparc64
        cpus = 0;
        root = OF_peer(0);
        for (child = OF_child(root); child != 0; child = OF_peer(child)) {
                if (OF_getprop(child, "device_type", buf, sizeof(buf)) > 0
&&
                    strcmp(buf, "cpu") == 0)
                        cpus++;
        }
        mp_maxid = cpus;

And I just changed amd64 and alpha to mean maxid + 1.  Damn. it looks like
just sparc64 and x86 were wrong.  Maybe I should change those to mean the
right thing, and backout the changes to uma.  yack.

>
> --
>
> John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
> "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031201165303.C4201-100000>