Date: Sun, 23 Jun 1996 00:56:06 +0400 (MSD) From: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (Andrey A. Chernov) <ache@nagual.ru> To: wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-gnu@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/man/man Makefile man.c Message-ID: <199606222056.AAA00484@nagual.ru> In-Reply-To: <199606221839.UAA07135@campa.panke.de> from "Wolfram Schneider" at "Jun 22, 96 08:39:21 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...] > KOI8-R writes: > >> I thought the general consensus was a sgid man, not suid. > > > >I don't see how sgid man can be better than suid man now, > > Security, security, security. Principle of least privilege. sgid man decreases security in current variant, it is pretty clear. group > single user > >but I see > >that sgid man requires additional changes in the permissions > >and man utils. > > minor changes. [any word you like] changes is additional ones. > >I don't hear that it is general consensus too. > > Look into the mailing list archive. Just look and found only your idea of doing that. -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@nagual.ru> http://www.nagual.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606222056.AAA00484>