Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 01:28:06 -0500 From: Chris Costello <chris@holly.dyndns.org> To: ben@rosengart.com Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kernel size over the last week Message-ID: <19990413012806.C2189@holly.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9904130216370.28839-100000@echonyc.com>; from Snob Art Genre on Tue, Apr 13, 1999 at 02:17:39AM -0400 References: <19990413003409.A1968@holly.dyndns.org> <Pine.GSO.4.10.9904130216370.28839-100000@echonyc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 13, 1999, Snob Art Genre wrote: > On Tue, 13 Apr 1999, Chris Costello wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 12, 1999, Snob Art Genre wrote: > > > I just built a kernel, from sources cvsupped last night. It's over 2 > > > megs in size, compared to 1.3 megs for a kernel built from the same > > > config file four days ago. > > > > Were there any drastic configuration differences? It seems to > > me that egcs binaries are a bit larger as far as file size goes, > > but my size change went from about 1.1-1.3 MB to about 1.7 MB. > > We were using egcs four days ago, weren't we? Anyway, no, there were no > configuration differences. We have been using egcs for much longer. This is the end of the second week. As I explained above, it's because egcs makes bigger binaries. -- Chris Costello <chris@calldei.com> Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers. - Leonard Brandwein To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990413012806.C2189>