Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 02:37:15 +0100 From: "Timur I. Bakeyev" <timur@gnu.org> To: Jose M Rodriguez <josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Moving samba ports Message-ID: <20051214013715.GA2267@com.bat.ru> In-Reply-To: <200512131118.09128.josemi@redesjm.local> References: <438085BF.9090708@gmail.com> <200512131118.09128.josemi@redesjm.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 11:18:08AM +0100, Jose M Rodriguez wrote: >=20 > El Domingo, 20 de Noviembre de 2005 15:18, Dennis Olvany escribi?: > > This package should depend on samba3, I think. Getting samba2 to work > > with cups is problematic at best. Samba3 is a breeze... a walk in the > > park... i.e. It actually works. Samba2 does not seems to work with a > > cups url like smb://guest@server/printer. > > > I think we must now move >=20 > net/samba -> net/samba2 That could make things more clear, agree. > net/samba3 -> net/samba No, that has no use. I have samba4 in my tree and hope it'll hit ports a bit later, so I'd preffer to stick to numbered versions of ports. Well, another question is that samba4 maybe called samba4-devel meanwhile... But not sure. > Or make net/samba3 the default samba port in all dependencies Agree on that, dunno why it's not default yet ;) With best regards, Timur Bakeyev.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051214013715.GA2267>