Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 05:40:22 +0300 From: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Q&A on textdumps Message-ID: <20071231024022.GA72445@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20071231014509.S21364@fledge.watson.org> References: <20071230130940.T98172@fledge.watson.org> <20071230210946.GA58498@nagual.pp.ru> <20071231002207.I21364@fledge.watson.org> <20071231014208.GA63099@nagual.pp.ru> <20071231014509.S21364@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 01:47:58AM +0000, Robert Watson wrote: > In principle, we could add a kdb.event.unattended script, which would > execute in cases where kdb would be entered except that the system is > unattended, with an automatic reboot afterwards. I'll have to look at the > way that the ddb/kdb relationship is structured there. Is that something > like what you had in mind? It would ensure a reboot at the end, regardless > of whether a dump was produced. Yes, thanks in advance. -- http://ache.pp.ru/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071231024022.GA72445>