Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 30 Sep 2015 06:35:11 +0000
From:      =?utf-8?B?S2FybGkgU2rDtmJlcmc=?= <karli.sjoberg@slu.se>
To:        Philip Murray <pmurray@nevada.net.nz>
Cc:        Graham Allan <allan@physics.umn.edu>, "freebsd-fs@freebsd.org" <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Cannot replace broken hard drive with LSI HBA
Message-ID:  <1443594911.5271.98.camel@data-b104.adm.slu.se>
In-Reply-To: <1A19B1E0-FC2F-4847-A3BA-E6F694589E4E@nevada.net.nz>
References:  <1443447383.5271.66.camel@data-b104.adm.slu.se> <5609578E.1050606@physics.umn.edu> <1443507440.5271.72.camel@data-b104.adm.slu.se> <560AF6AD.3010803@physics.umn.edu> <1A19B1E0-FC2F-4847-A3BA-E6F694589E4E@nevada.net.nz>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

ons 2015-09-30 klockan 13:39 +1300 skrev Philip Murray:
> 
> > On 30/09/2015, at 9:38 am, Graham Allan <allan@physics.umn.edu> wrote:
> > 
> > On 9/29/2015 1:17 AM, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> Regarding your experience with firmware 20, I believe it is "known bad",
> >>> though some seem to disagree. Certainly when building my recent-ish
> >>> large 9.3 servers I specifically tested it and got consistent data
> >>> corruption. There is now a newer release of firmware 20 , "20.00.04.00"
> >>> which seems to be fixed - see this thread:
> >>> 
> >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi/2015-August/006793.html
> >> 
> >> No, firmware 20.00.04.00 and driver 20.00.00.00-fbsd was the one that
> >> was used when ZFS freaked out, so it´s definitely not fixed.
> >> 
> >> I think this calls for a bug report.
> > 
> > That is curious, since I could rapidly get data corruption with firmware 20.00.00.00, yet ran a stress test for about a week with 20.00.04.00 with no issues. That was with FreeBSD 9.3, but I just updated my test system to 10.2, and it has been running the same stress test for 4-5 hours again with no issues. I don't doubt your experience at all, of course, but I wonder what is different?
> > 
> > For what it's worth, my test machine is a Dell R610 with Dell TYVGC HBA (unclear whether this is a 9207-8e or 9205-8e), and WD Red drives in a Supermicro SC847 chassis.
> 
> Just as an additional datapoint (this thread is giving me chills) with the LSI IT firmware version 20.00.02.00…
> 
> * FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE
> * Supermicro SC826 Chassis
> * LSI SAS2004 Controller
> 	mps0: <Avago Technologies (LSI) SAS2004> port 0xe000-0xe0ff mem 0xf72c0000-0xf72c3fff,0xf7280000-0xf72bffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1
> 	mps0: Firmware: 20.00.02.00, Driver: 20.00.00.00-fbsd
> 	mps0: IOCCapabilities: 1285c<ScsiTaskFull,DiagTrace,SnapBuf,EEDP,TransRetry,EventReplay,HostDisc>
> 
> * LSI SAS2X28 Expander/Backplane
> 	ses0: <LSI SAS2X28 0e12> Fixed Enclosure Services SPC-3 SCSI device 
> 
> * 12x SATA WD RE 2TB  drives (WD2000FYYZ arranged as 2x RAIDZ2 vdevs)
> 
> Repeatedly filled up with data with regular scrubs without any issues and performance is pretty good, although I haven’t had a disk fail yet. 
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Phil 

Really good to hear Phil, thanks! I´m going to test a 9201 today with
P20.00.04.00 and 20.00.00.00-fbsd to see if there´s any difference in
models.

/K

home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1443594911.5271.98.camel>