Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:01:30 +0000
From:      "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
To:        Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Andrew Turner <andrew@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r234337 - in head: lib/libc/arm/gen sys/arm/include
Message-ID:  <AEC8B145-8DD5-4504-8DAF-255B64B6C3D2@lists.zabbadoz.net>
In-Reply-To: <CACVs6=8BYYN0ZW7zzHZduns-ZH9hUF=M1EmXfoOkCZVMh1ubpg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201204160938.q3G9cLmw026093@svn.freebsd.org> <CACVs6=8BYYN0ZW7zzHZduns-ZH9hUF=M1EmXfoOkCZVMh1ubpg@mail.gmail.com>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail


On 16. Apr 2012, at 19:41 , Juli Mallett wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 02:38, Andrew Turner <andrew@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> Log:
>>  Replace the C implementation of __aeabi_read_tp with an assembly version.
>>  This ensures we follow the ABI by preserving registers r1-r3.
> 
>> +ENTRY(__aeabi_read_tp)
>> +       ldr     r0, .Larm_tp_address
>> +       ldr     r0, [r0]
>> +       RET
>> +
>> +.Larm_tp_address:
>> +       .word ARM_TP_ADDRESS
>> +
> 
> Why is this indirection required?  Can't you just use ARM_TP_ADDRESS
> instead of loading it from data?  Also, is our convention for ARM to
> use END() with ENTRY() or not?

Don't you generally want END() . ?

-- 
Bjoern A. Zeeb                                 You have to have visions!
   It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!



home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AEC8B145-8DD5-4504-8DAF-255B64B6C3D2>