Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:00:02 +0200 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: <section> vs. <sectN> Message-ID: <xzp1xivpabx.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20040728213909.GA94208@gothmog.gr> (Giorgos Keramidas's message of "Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:39:09 %2B0300") References: <20040728205248.GI424@submonkey.net> <20040728213909.GA94208@gothmog.gr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org> writes: > I'm not sure if it was a matter of personal taste or if he had something > else in mind. I'd like to hear what he has to say too before deciding > for or against some style rule. I believe <sectN> is deprecated in newer DocBook versions. My main reason for preferring <section>, though, is that it makes life a lot easier if you ever need to move sections up or down. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp1xivpabx.fsf>