Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 13:40:11 +0100 From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> To: Adam Kranzel <adam@blacktabby.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about using PORTREVISION vs. DISTFILES Message-ID: <3FB61EAB.7060907@fillmore-labs.com> In-Reply-To: <200311150411.15118.adam@blacktabby.org> References: <200311150411.15118.adam@blacktabby.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Adam Kranzel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've got a small patch for the audio/easytag port, which adds a few bugfix
> patches from the author. The software is at version 0.30c once the patches
> are applied, but the tarball is still version 0.30. Would it be more correct
> to leave PORTVERSION at 0.30 and set PORTREVISION = 1, or to set PORTVERSION
> = 0.30c and use DISTFILES to have it fetch the tarball properly?
If you do
DISTFILES= easytag-0.30.tar.bz2
PATCHFILES= patch_easytag_030_030a.diff \
patch_easytag_030a_030b.diff \
patch_easytag_030b_030c.diff
then make the PORTVERSION 0.30c.
It should be essentially equivalent to easytag-0.30c.tar.bz2.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3FB61EAB.7060907>