Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 10:24:01 -0500 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@emsphone.com> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp>, n@nectar.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pw_class in _pw_passwd is null if __hashpw() is not called in prior Message-ID: <20000928102400.A17446@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <200009281513.LAA82640@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>; from "Garrett Wollman" on Thu Sep 28 11:13:47 GMT 2000 References: <20000906151431.A26152@hamlet.nectar.com> <14798.4853.288090.72159A@silver.carrots.uucp.r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> <20000924100812.A23848@spawn.nectar.com> <200009281350.WAA23538@bunko> <200009281513.LAA82640@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Sep 28), Garrett Wollman said: > <<On Thu, 28 Sep 2000 22:50:53 +0900, Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> said: > > Here is another possible trouble. While libc.so.4 with nsswitch no > > longer requires the magic '+' entry, libc.so.3 and earlier still > > require '+'. > > IMHO, This Is A Bug. Depends on what Seigo meant. If he meant that libc.so.4 and no /etc/nsswitch.conf implicitly adds a "+" to the end of /etc/passwd, that's definitely a bug. If he meant that libc.so.4 and an nsswitch.conf of "passwd: files nis" doesn't require a "+", that's fine. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@emsphone.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000928102400.A17446>