Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 17:25:43 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Benjamin Kaduk <bjk@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: old style kernel configuration Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1211221725170.7420@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgmxiaA1twJf%2BKMv=ZpxCWp1MdL5GEEEFLwBuRqcGpctdQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAF6rxgmxiaA1twJf%2BKMv=ZpxCWp1MdL5GEEEFLwBuRqcGpctdQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012, Eitan Adler wrote: > I've been working on removing obsolete information various documents. > While going through older articles I noticed a few references to the > "old style" kernel configuration involving running config(1) manually. > > Is there any value in keeping this documented as an alternative to > "make buildkernel" or should it be treated as an implementation detail? why should i do "make buildkernel" when not cross compiling? i always use config
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1211221725170.7420>