Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 15:12:32 +0300 From: Rozhuk Ivan <rozhuk.im@gmail.com> To: Borja Marcos <borjam@sarenet.es> Cc: Jordan Hubbard <jordan.hubbard@gmail.com>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Thought experiment] Bringing swift into an experimental branch? Message-ID: <20250617151232.76a895f4@rimwks.local> In-Reply-To: <1632F5EA-8DFC-4764-96E4-E2633BA0C2FF@sarenet.es> References: <7344B44E-0AED-44CA-903D-B8DFC2D56311@gmail.com> <20250617013743.3b5108f0@rimwks.local> <1632F5EA-8DFC-4764-96E4-E2633BA0C2FF@sarenet.es>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 08:02:08 +0200 Borja Marcos <borjam@sarenet.es> wrote: > > On 17 Jun 2025, at 00:37, Rozhuk Ivan <rozhuk.im@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > No modern language required, even C++ is to complex to learn it. > > C just works, like it work 30-40 years ago. > > All can be done on C. > > Well, if counting bytes is your thing, yes, everything can be done in > C. The fact that using a systems programming language for > applications is a bad idea has been proven beyond doubt. ;) > > The problem is language stability as Jordan pointed out. I remember I > said something similar about Rust. > "systems programming language" - does not exist. OS have no complex applications, even assembler can be used, Colibry OS as example.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20250617151232.76a895f4>