Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:12:18 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu>, Ashish SHUKLA <ashish@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/accessibility/jovie Makefile ports/accessibility/kdeaccessibility4 Makefile ports/astro/kstars Makefile ports/astro/marble Makefile ports/audio/akode-plugins-ffmpeg Makefile ports/audio/amarok Makefile ports/audio/amarok-fs Makefile ports/audio/amarok-kde4 ... Message-ID: <4F3E6042.9000008@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F3E5FC9.3000103@yandex.ru> References: <201202161557.q1GFvYRK041580@repoman.freebsd.org> <4F3DB9C9.2070503@missouri.edu> <4F3E4958.2050805@FreeBSD.org> <20120217143931.Horde.nnHOQpjmRSRPPliTKUax9BA@webmail.leidinger.net> <4F3E5D9B.1070807@FreeBSD.org> <4F3E5FC9.3000103@yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2012/02/17 15:10, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > Pav Lucistnik wrote on 17.02.2012 18:00: >> On 2012/02/17 14:39, Alexander Leidinger wrote: >>> >>> Quoting Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> (from Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:34:32 >>> +0100): >>> >>>> On 2012/02/17 03:22, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: >>>> >>>>> Also, is there an effective and foolproof method to calculating all >>>>> the >>>>> LIB_DEPENDS? (Remembering that some of the LIB_DEPENDS may depend on >>>>> optional settings, and these all need to be considered?) >>>> >>>> Only sure way to find out would be to run ldd on every binary in every >>>> package. >>> >>> /usr/ports/Tools/scripts/explicit_lib_depends.sh looks which libs are >>> recorded as directly required for each binary in an installed port and >>> calculates a LIB_DEPENDS based upon this. >>> >>> When I wanted to change the LIB_DEPENDS to match the output, I was told, >>> that the LIB_DEPENDS wass correct, and the it is a bug (in libtool, >>> pkg-config and similar ways of obtaining the libs) that additional libs >>> are recorded there. >> >> Yes but that's a somewhat different problem. I'd be happy with >> identifying all direct _and_ indirect binaries and bumping their ports, >> for now. Still better than relying on Makefile/INDEX metadata.. > > Dunno, if it's correct, but I'm using beta.freshports.org interface to > grab depended port's list. F.e. http://beta.freshports.org/devel/pcre: > lists all the ports in "Required by: " field. They are splitted by "for > Build", "for Libraries" and "for Run". That's just what is in INDEX... -- Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz> <pav@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F3E6042.9000008>