Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:40:37 -0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, "office@freebsd.org" <office@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmo=U5%2BD3uWfzaibiLDL-xzVL39zK7khU%2B5q-A-R=4ttvng@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <512545D9.4060401@aldan.algebra.com> References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> <CADLo83-a7yqkFhgMinGiookjvgtFuTVeGQobOepuHDCeH_wsog@mail.gmail.com> <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> <20130220204108.GA55280@server.rulingia.com> <512545D9.4060401@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20 February 2013 13:53, Mikhail T. <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com> wrote: >> As others have indicated, the toolchain provided in the base system is >> intended only for building the base system. > This was never true before and it is rather sad, if it were really > becoming the truth now. More than likely, though, this is just a cheap > excuse. Kind of like: "you did not pay for the code, did you, so don't > expect it to work". That's because of a mad dash for new C/C++ functionailty post 4.2 which also happened to coincide with a licence change to GPLv3. Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmo=U5%2BD3uWfzaibiLDL-xzVL39zK7khU%2B5q-A-R=4ttvng>