Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:36:51 -0500 From: alexus <alexus@gmail.com> To: "Steve Bertrand" <iaccounts@ibctech.ca> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: multihome network Message-ID: <6ae50c2d0711161336y34666fb1n90185c100178957e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <473E05ED.7080004@ibctech.ca> References: <6ae50c2d0711152118h2f2a9989q2b39eba077154041@mail.gmail.com> <20071116063832.GB4164@saraswathy.susmita.org> <473DA109.6020707@ibctech.ca> <6ae50c2d0711160850x14df83c8nf278d995936349a7@mail.gmail.com> <473DCE68.6010509@ibctech.ca> <6ae50c2d0711161223n4d219ce1l48636bbfe5d2f08c@mail.gmail.com> <473E05ED.7080004@ibctech.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
but then i'm going say route _ALL_ traffic for that, and i need to be able to get in through both interfaces, as if one ISP is down, i can access in through another... thats the whole point of this thing On Nov 16, 2007 4:04 PM, Steve Bertrand <iaccounts@ibctech.ca> wrote: > alexus wrote: > > i dont see any difference as at the end i still get this > > > > 216.112.241.24/29 216.112.241.25 UGS 0 0 fxp1 > > > > in my netstat -rn, and no its still doesn't work... > > This is not the point. > > You need a route via the gateway that 216 is connected to for the REMOTE > IP/network. Say for instance your 'home' connection is: > > 64.39.177.22, then you need a route like this: > > route add 64.39.177.22/32 $isp_gateway > > What you have: > > 216.112.241.24/29 216.112.241.25 UGS 0 0 fxp1 > > ...says '206.112.241.24/29 should be routed to 216.112.241.25. That is > ALL it will route via that path. > > Steve > -- http://alexus.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6ae50c2d0711161336y34666fb1n90185c100178957e>