Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:20:15 +0200 (CEST) From: Michael Reifenberger <mike@Reifenberger.com> To: Michael Bushkov <bushman@rsu.ru> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, LI Xin <delphij@delphij.net> Subject: Re: [HEADS UP]: OpenLDAP+nss_ldap+nss_modules separated patch and more (SoC) Message-ID: <20060822091845.D3909@fw.reifenberger.com> In-Reply-To: <002901c6c5ba$628b67d0$9800a8c0@carrera> References: <44E9582C.2010400@rsu.ru> <44EAA213.6010507@delphij.net> <002901c6c5ba$628b67d0$9800a8c0@carrera>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, Michael Bushkov wrote:
...
>> Would you please consider having the imported OpenLDAP to install shared
>> objects under alternative names? It might be painful for users who
>> wants OpenLDAP installation from the ports collection (as OpenLDAP team
>> moves fast and fixes bug from time to time) if they get a same library
>> in /usr/lib...
>
> I've been thinking about that. Would names like "libldap_i.so" and
> "liblber_i.so" be ok ("_i" means "imported", or "internal")?
>
Or like our XML library(libbsdxml*): libbsdldab*
Bye/2
---
Michael Reifenberger, Business Development Manager SAP-Basis, Plaut Consulting
Comp: Michael.Reifenberger@plaut.de | Priv: Michael@Reifenberger.com
http://www.plaut.de | http://www.Reifenberger.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060822091845.D3909>