Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 17:33:34 -0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> Cc: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@kuzbass.ru> Subject: Re: ng_nat revisited Message-ID: <420816EE.5080906@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20050207131148.GA92617@cell.sick.ru> References: <200501250834.11393.darcy@wavefire.com> <20050207124637.GE91619@cell.sick.ru> <420766FF.714B372D@kuzbass.ru> <20050207131148.GA92617@cell.sick.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gleb Smirnoff wrote: >On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 08:02:55PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >E> > D> It's been a while since the subject of ng_nat appeared on-list, I'm wondering >E> > D> if there has been anymore work done on this? >E> > >E> > Now I'm trying to work on this. I don't guarantee any success in recent future. >E> > >E> > The first step is porting libalias to be a kernel module. I have already >E> > patches to make it compilable as kernel module, however with some features >E> > disabled - alias monitoring, sockets, and ipfw punching. The first two can >E> > be abandoned, but ipfw punching needs to be reimplemented in kernel. >E> >E> Why do you think alias monitoring may be abadoned? > >It does logging into file. It is difficult to implement same thing in kernel. >May be it will be substituted with bare log(9). > or have "monitor" hook.. > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?420816EE.5080906>