Date: Wed, 19 Mar 1997 14:00:25 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CVS repository pushed off the FreeBSD CD distribution... Message-ID: <199703192200.OAA26163@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 19 Mar 1997 12:34:31 PST." <7234.858803671@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It will be nice to have all three: 1. FreeBSD distribution 2. Ports/packages 3. CVS And I am willing to pay the small fee. Cheers, Amancio >From The Desk Of "Jordan K. Hubbard" : > > >Despite what all the hackers may think, I feel that the ports/packages > > >still represent better value than the CVS repository so there's no > > >question in my mind about which bits get precedence, the question > > >being more one of "what do we do now for the CVS repository fans?" > > > > More SNAP cd's ? > > If I don't have to put ports or packages on the SNAP CDs, sure! :-) > Remember, the SNAPs are only a single CD (and priced $10 less than the > others). > > Would people prefer the SNAPs to become full CDs? They'd probably > have to go up to the $39.95/$25.94 (sub) price if I had to do 2 of > them each time, but I could make one the SNAP/package CD and the other > the unpacked CVS tree, unpacked src and unpacked ports (I'd have room > for all). > > Would there be interest in something like that? > > Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703192200.OAA26163>