Date: Mon, 01 Sep 1997 09:33:35 +0930 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, Peter Korsten <peter@grendel.IAEhv.nl>, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysinstall (was Re: Conclusion to "NT vs. Unix" debate) Message-ID: <199709010003.JAA04315@word.smith.net.au> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 31 Aug 1997 18:31:23 EST." <Pine.BSF.3.96.970831175422.307J-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> On Sun, 31 Aug 1997, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>
> > Let's take sysinstall for example, something which you say has a
> > confusing GUI with a poor selection model. I agree with you.
> > sysinstall's UI is a festering heap of trash which annoys me, its
> > principle author, probably more than anyone. Why is it so evil?
> > Because it uses libdialog(3) and a series of hand-rolled curses(3)
> > screens, the many limitations of those stemming from the general
> > unwieldyness of curses programming and my lack of time to sit down and
> > write a whole bunch of advanced curses widgets like scrolling list
> > boxes or expanding lists.
>
> Indeed there are numerous mechanical glitches in the interface
> that are annoying and can be attributed to a less than stunning
> UI library, but some larger scale navigation problems are not
> really toolkit related.
>
> Particularly disorienting is the behavior of the "Cancel"
> buttons, or the lack of a "back" button.
These are also "features" of the UI, believe it or not.
> When proceeding through
> the various setup screens, if a mistake is made you usually end
> up going right back to the start and have to proceed through the
> whole process again. A "back" button also provides the essential
> ability to review the installation options before pressing the GO
> button.
As an issue of curiosity, and for general review does the sequence :
- step sequentially (in some hopefully logocal order) through all the
required configuration dialogs
- present the gathered information in summary form, with functionality
to jump immediately to a particular editing screen if a parameter is
found to be wrong (by the user)
- offer a proceed/cancel selection
come closer to the ideal for the gather/review/confirm cycle?
mike
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709010003.JAA04315>