Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 05:58:58 +0000 (UTC) From: Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org> To: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: svn commit: r300115 - head/sys/boot/forth Message-ID: <201605180558.u4I5wwPD049295@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Author: imp Date: Wed May 18 05:58:57 2016 New Revision: 300115 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/300115 Log: Explain why extra sutff always outputs even when it shouldn't for the '?' command. Wasted a bunch of time tracking it down tonight. Modified: head/sys/boot/forth/loader.4th Modified: head/sys/boot/forth/loader.4th ============================================================================== --- head/sys/boot/forth/loader.4th Wed May 18 05:56:25 2016 (r300114) +++ head/sys/boot/forth/loader.4th Wed May 18 05:58:57 2016 (r300115) @@ -230,6 +230,13 @@ only forth definitions also support-func : .? 2 spaces 2swap 15 #type 2 spaces type cr ; +\ Execute the ? command to print all the commands defined in +\ C, then list the ones we support here. Please note that this +\ doesn't use pager_* routines that the C implementation of ? +\ does, so these will always appear, even if you stop early +\ there. And they may cause the commands to scroll off the +\ screen if the number of commands modulus LINES is close +\ to LINEs.... : ? ['] ? execute s" boot-conf" s" load kernel and modules, then autoboot" .?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201605180558.u4I5wwPD049295>